I write in opposition to the Peak 6 expansion. As a 20 year resident and business owner, I have watched Breckenridge evolve from a charming ski town to a “ski city” stumbling to keep on its feet. The towns infrastructure can barely handle the existing traffic, and I believe more thought should be put in to this proposal because of this. I live here for the superb quality of life, but this too is slowly becoming compromised.
As a business owner I can appreciate the town wanting to increase revenue, but at what cost? Bigger is not always better … but Vail’s marketing plan is a good one. They certainly have the most to gain from this, as do their shareholders. More terrain to advertise is by far the best option for them.
The beetle kill has had a devastating effect on both the landscape and wildlife here. More time needs to be spent understanding the long term repercussions of this. Coupled with the town’s unbridled growth and development, we can’t be sure of the impact if we rush in to action for those precious dollars.
Enough is enough. The ski area is huge and on this trajectory it will never end. When will we be able to say no?
Thank you for your consideration and taking the time to read this.
Breckenridge open house set for June 23; Front Range open house coming up, as well as a Peak 6 site visit on July 14
By Summit Voice
BRECKENRIDGE — It’s a common misconception that the trees within the proposed Breckenridge Peak 6 expansion area are lodgepole pines dying from the pine beetle epidemic.
In reality, healthy spruce and fir forest, including ancient legacy trees, dominate the alpine terrain, as described in the U.S. Forest Service draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS): “Spruce-fir within stands average approximately 90 years in age, although some stands may be much older in the Peak 6 area, where individual trees over 300 years of age were observed (legacy trees).”
The Forest Service is providing citizens with the opportunity to meet one-on-one with Forest Service personnel and learn more about all the proposed alternatives in the DEIS at June 23 open house, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. in the Beaver Run Ballroom of the Beaver Run Resort and Conference Center, located at 620 Village Road in Breckenridge, Colorado. Continue reading “Breckenridge: More info on the proposed Peak 6 expansion”→
Resort officials say new terrain is needed to stay competitive
Listen to an audio transcript of the Peak 6 presentation at the Jan. 25 Breckenridge Town Council work session, including a presentation by ski area chief Pat Campbell and questions from town council members.
By Bob Berwyn & Jenney Coberly
SUMMIT COUNTY — Even as she acknowledged that Breckenridge has been among the top two most-visited ski areas in the U.S. during the past decade, resort chief Pat Campbell said the ski area needs the proposed Peak 6 expansion to stay competitive as a premier resort in the ski industry.
“It’s no secret that Breckenridge Ski Resort in the last decade has been has been either the most or second-most visited resort in the United States,” Campbell said Tuesday afternoon, updating the Breckenridge Town Council on the status of the expansion plan. “In fact we do that on less than half the skiable acreage that Vail has,” Campbell said. “Peak 6, we feel, is our best opportunity to really mitigate some of the crowding and guest experience issues that we have come to experience.” Continue reading “Breckenridge Town Council gets Peak 6 update”→
Proposed Peak 6 Expansion Project Overview Presentation to Breckenridge Town Council January 25, 2011 Work Session
Breckenridge Ski Resort (BSR) has fluctuated between the most- and second-most visited resort in the U.S. over the past decade making it consistently one of the busiest mountain resorts in North America. Historically, peak visitation days put pressure on the existing terrain and infrastructure capacities. As visitation increases, the quality of the recreational experience is impacted. High trail densities and long lift lines are associated with three periods:
(1) peak days;
(2) average days during key egress periods; and
(3) new snow days in areas of off-piste, lift-served terrain.
To begin to mitigate these issues and improve the guest experience, Breckenridge has identified the need for the following needs:
• Better accommodation of current daily visitation levels; • Reduced skier/rider congestion on BSR’s existing Intermediate and Advanced intermediate terrain network and associated lifts; • Reduced waiting time for lifts at BSR; • Efficient dispersal of Intermediate and Advanced Intermediate skiers/riders across the entire skiable terrain network; • Additional lift-served terrain to accommodate the existing terrain distribution deficit; • Additional hike-to access servicing advanced ability levelsContinue reading “Breckenridge: Town council update on Peak 6”→
Will social media play a role in the outcome of a classic ski town showdown?
By Bob Berwyn
SUMMIT COUNTY — Like almost everything else in the information age, a battle over a proposed ski area expansion in Breckenridge, Colorado, will be partially waged on the web. Both supporters and opponents of the plan to build a new lift and clear-cut new trails on Peak 6 are signing up on Facebook pages to take a stand — or at least to stay informed about the issue.
Breckenridge Ski Area first proposed the expansion a couple of years ago. In the initial round of formal Forest Service documents, the resort and the agency said the new terrain is needed to meet demand for intermediate terrain at what has been the country’s most-visited ski resort the past few seasons. Breckenridge has averaged about 1.5 million skier visits per season.
Forest Service says draft study on plan is due in September; agency will publish a newsletter on project in the next few weeks to update stakeholders
By Bob Berwyn
SUMMIT COUNTY — A pending proposal to expand lift-served skiing at Breckenridge will include a “Peak 6-Light” option, including in-fill development within the resort’s existing footprint, as well as gladed Peak 6 terrain. The scaled-back version includes a shorter lift than envisioned in the initial version of the plan, which includes a lift extending well above treeline, to near the summit of Peak 6.
The U.S. Forest Service now hopes to release a draft environmental impact study for the Peak 6 plan in September. In the next couple of weeks, the agency will be sending out a newsletter to update interested parties on the Peak 6 mailing, said Roger Poirer, the winter sports program administrator for the White River National Forest.
Vail Resorts officials said last week via e-mail that they had no comment on the expansion proposal at this time.
“We wanted to develop a realistic alternative proposal … not just a straw-man alternative that we’d never pick,” Poirer said. The draft study will also show various options for mitigating impacts from tree-clearing and development on Peak 6, especially as those activities relate to threatened lynx, Poirer said. Continue reading “Breckenridge ski area expansion: Peak 6-lite?”→