Grassroots resistance pays off; fossil fuel economics also a factor
Climate activists say this week’s request by TransCanada for a time-out of the Keystone XL tarsands pipeline review process is a clear sign that the political tide has shifted against the expansion of fossil fuels.
Study bolsters arguments against more tar sands exploitation
FRISCO —A new study by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory will add fuel to controversy over development of tar sands oil.
The analyis shows that gasoline and diesel refined from Canadian oil sands release about 20 percent more carbon into the atmosphere over its lifetime than fuel from conventional domestic crude sources.
Oil price drop should be bigger factor in evaluations
By Bob Berwyn
FRISCO — In case there was ever any doubt (and there wasn’t), the EPA this week made it clear that construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline would result in a significant increase in greenhouse gas emissions.
Sioux Nation wants to focus on renewable energy, not dirty tar sands oil
FRISCO — Just a few days after responding angrily to the U.S. House vote to approve the Keystone XL Pipeline, Sioux Nation Native American leaders met with the Obama administration to explore renewable energy options.
‘We are a sovereign nation and we are not being treated as such … We will close our reservation borders to Keystone XL’
By Summit Voice
FRISCO — Conservation groups and climate activists aren’t the only ones hopping mad about the Congressional rush to approve the Keystone XL pipeline. Native Americans in South Dakota say they consider last week’s House vote to approve the pipeline “an act of war.”
No relief yet for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service whistleblowers
By Summit Voice
FRISCO — It’s pretty clear that top-level decisions on the Keystone XL pipeline are going to be made based primarily on political considerations, but a watchdog group is charging that federal agencies are taking extraordinary steps to cover their tracks after issuing flawed and politically tainted reports.
According to the U.S. Department of Interior’s inspector general, the tainted process damages the department’s credibility and integrity.
Wednesday’s vote on H.R. 3, the Northern Route Approval Act, marks the seventh time the House has tried to force approval of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline. While today’s vote saw fewer representatives voting in favor of the resolution than past votes, it still showed the oil money rules congress.
Watchdog groups did the math:
Members of Congress supporting the pipeline took in a combined $56 million from fossil fuel interests, $36 million from oil industry interests alone;
Members supporting the pipeline took an average of $233,774 from all fossil fuel interests, $150,604 from oil industry interests alone;
Members opposing the pipeline took an average of $24,886 from all fossil fuel interests, and $24,886 from oil industry alone; and