BLM claims 2 billion tons of coal has no climate impact

Court battle over Wyoming public lands coal leases shows contradictions in Obama’s climate change policies

Coal mining in Wyoming
An open-pit coal mine in Wyoming. Photo courtesy BLM.

Staff Report

The battle over fossil fuels is intensifying both on the ground — where activists are protesting new coal projects — and in the courts, where environmental organizations are trying to block a series of huge federal coal leases on public lands in the U.S.

In the U.S. District Court case, the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians are challenging four leases that would permit fossil fuel companies to strip mine more than two billion tons of coal, and the conservation groups pointed out this week in a press release that the federal government is taking the absurd position that the leases won’t affect the amount of coal mined, the amount of coal burned, or the amount of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere.

“President Obama and Secretary Jewell took a huge step forward to protect our climate when they announced the comprehensive review of the federal coal leasing program … But lawyers defending BLM continue to deny that the largest leases in the history of the federal coal leasing program have any impact on our climate — and that is flat out wrong,” said said Bill Corcoran, Western Regional Campaign Director for the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal campaign.

Corcoran was referring to a brief filed by BLM attorneys showing that the federal agency is adhering to historic policies that are out of step with the Obama administration’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

“Even as President Obama is acknowledging the need to keep fossil fuels in the ground, the BLM is actively defending its decision to approve billions of tons of new coal mining,’“ said Jeremy Nichols, the Climate and Energy Program director for WildEarth Guardians. “For our climate and our future, the President and Secretary Jewell need to rein in this rogue agency and start keeping our coal in the ground,” Nichols said.

The new leases would expand what already the largest coal mines in the U.S. Coal from the Powder River Basin is burned throughout the U.S. and is increasingly exported to Asia, releasing carbon pollution on a global scale.

If all of the newly leased coal were burned, it would release more than 3.3 billion metric tons of carbon pollution into the air, the equivalent of cutting down enough trees to cover an area more than twice the size of Texas.


2 thoughts on “BLM claims 2 billion tons of coal has no climate impact

  1. From outside America it appears that it is only Obama and the scientific community that understands the dangers of climate change and are trying to do something about it. Congress, the business community and the media all want fossil fuels regardless of the future cost.

  2. I have a simple solution to save the environment, pay off the national debt, and end the hypocrisy. We create a national Coal registry and every man, woman or child must declare their position, yes or no. Everyone who says yes stays connected to the grid. All no answers are immediately disconnected from the electric power system and the copper in their house removed and sold to the Chinese. To reconnect to the grid, you pay $100,000.00. All monies collected pays off the national debt. See? Pure genius, the cure to environmental and social issues all in one basket. No need to thank me, I am going into the power shutoff and copper recycling business.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s