Arctic sea ice dwindles to second-lowest extent ever

dsdaf
Arctic sea ice now at it’s second-lowest extent on record. @bberwyn photo.

Antarctic sea ice extent below average for the first time in four years

Staff Report

FRISCO — In a mid-month update, researchers with the National Snow and Ice Data Center said that Arctic sea ice has dwindled to the second-lowest extent on record, with an above-average melt rate during the first half of August. The only time there was less sea ice was in 2012, which set the record for the lowest extent.

The NSIDC also reported that Antarctic sea ice extent is below the 1981 to 2010 average for the first time in nearly four years. Antarctic sea ice expanded by just 96,500 square miles between August 1 and August 17, and retreated around the Antarctic Peninsula, in the Ross Sea, and around the coast of Wilkes Land.

The ice trackers said they’re close to being able to project how low the ice extent will go this year using new models developed by research scientist Andrew Slater. The refined models correctly projected minimum sea ice extent in previous years, but the models have also been off by as much as 600,000 square miles in some years.

Based on the latest analysis, the northern sea route through the Arctic along the Russian coast appears to be open, while the Northwest Passage is still clogged with ice — although some of the remote sensing data suggests there may be an open water route along Norwegian explorer Roald Amundsen’s historical route through the southern part of the Canadian Archipelago.

Read the full update here.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Arctic sea ice dwindles to second-lowest extent ever

  1. Day 231 (19th August) of Arctic extent, as shown at http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph/

    1980’s average 7,789,000 square kilometres
    2015 5,576,000
    2011 5,370,000
    2007 5,177,000
    2012 4,617,000

    If Andrew Slater can’t get this easily verifiable fact correct, the rest of his analysis isn’t going to be any more accurate. I suggest he focuses on modelling which by its nature isn’t so easy to overturn.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s