Pope’s message tackles ethical and moral implications of climate and environmental policy choices

Pope Francis released his environmental encyclical just as climate scientists said that May was yet another record warm month for planet Earth, and that 2015 is likely to be the warmest year ever for the globe.

‘Those who profited least from the exploitation of fossil fuels and contributed least to greenhouse-gas emissions are hit hardest by global warming impacts’

Staff Report

FRISCO — It’s easiest to look at global warming through a purely scientific lens. Simple physics provide a completely logical explanation for the steady upward trend in global temperatures.

It’s much harder to to address the issue when you add politics and ethics to the equation, which is what Pope Francis sought to do with his recent “Laudato Si” encyclical on inequality and the environment.

Crafting the language may have been like walking on a tightrope above a political and religious minefield, but in the end, it will pay off by giving scientists more of a buffer for talking about climate and the environment in moral terms.

Take, for example, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. Long an advocate for reducing greenhouse gas emissions on scientific grounds, Schellnhuber was one of the key science advisors involved in helping the Vatican develop the encyclical, and when he spoke at at the event announcing the document, he was very direct about the connections between the moral and scientific parts of the equation.

“Not the poor but the wealthy are putting our planet, and ultimately humanity, at risk … those who profited least from the exploitation of fossil fuels and contributed least to greenhouse-gas emissions are hit hardest by global warming impacts, unless we strongly reduce emissions,” said Schellnhuber, the only scientist  invited to speak, alongside Cardinal Peter Turkson.

In the run-up to the encyclical, Schellnhuber participated in a number of workshops organized by the highly renowned Pontifical Academy of Sciences. The document issued by the leader of more than one billion Catholics around the world is expected to be an important signal on the road to a global agreement on emissions reductions, to be negotiated by governments at the world climate summit in Paris later this year.

Other PIK scientists also connected the dots between economic and political choices and the environmental outcomes.

“The atmosphere, heaven above us all, is a global common – yet it is used as a waste-dump for greenhouse gases by the few,” said Ottmar Edenhofer, chief economist of PIK and director of the Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change.

“The Pope is making history in highlighting this. If we want to avoid dangerous climate change, we have to restrict the use of the atmosphere by putting a price on CO2 emissions. This would generate revenues which could be used to improve access to clean water or education, especially for the poor.”



3 thoughts on “Pope’s message tackles ethical and moral implications of climate and environmental policy choices

  1. Taxes, fees and financial charges for disposing of polluting discharges and waste disposal are common. Landfills, electronic waste water discharges of pollutants are examples. Other pollutants are subject to regulatory controls that require investments for implementation, such as SO2 from power plants and NOx from cars; this is standard practice. The world cannot afford to let CO2 discharges be free any more. The costs of increased climate-related disaster, whether immediate or gradual ones such as sea level rise, are enormous. The cost of going beyond the “tipping point” of 2 degrees Celsius. is beyond calculation or even contemplation. The only analogous human-caused disaster scenario is the one associated with the Cold War: the explosion of scores of nuclear weapons going off in a missile exchange between the US and Russia: “Mutually Assured Destruction” not only of two countries but of global populations and ecosystems. Economic and moral reasons tie together to warrant the abolition of free CO2 discharges.
    Albert G. Melcher Captain Civil Engineer Corps USNR Retired

  2. It’s funny that the liberals are always bashing religious organizations for their beliefs, but suddenly they are all buddy-buddy when the Pope makes a ridiculous statement…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s