Is it time to end barbaric wildlife killing contests?

Should coyoyes be targeted in wildlife killing contests?

Advocacy groups seek ban in New Mexico

Staff Report

FRISCO — Emboldened by California’s recent ban on wildlife killing contests, wildlife advocates say they want lawmakers to enact similar restrictions in New Mexico, which holds more such events than any other state.

A coalition of 10 groups is calling on the governor and state legislature to ban contests that target coyotes, bobcats, foxes, prairie dogs and other animals, calling them immoral and biologically unsound.

There were at least 17  wildlife-killing contests in New Mexico between August 2013 and July 2014, according to data provided by Wildlife Conservation Advocacy Southwest. At least 130 such events were held nationally during that period. At least three coyote-killing contests took place in New Mexico just this past weekend.

“The fact that New Mexico is number one in this area is an embarrassment to the state,” said Kevin Bixby, executive director of the Southwest Environmental Center. “Now is the time for the legislature and governor to ban these barbaric events.”

“Once we started tracking the contests in 2012, we found many more than we had anticipated,” said Elisabeth Dicharry of Wildlife Conservation Advocacy Southwest. “We found that New Mexico ranked among the highest in the nation for numbers of contests. We know this is the tip of the iceberg because not all wildlife-killing contests are widely publicized.”

Wildlife-killing contests are organized events in which participants compete for prizes by attempting to kill the most animals over a certain time period. Coyotes are the most common target, but other targeted species include bobcats, badgers, foxes, skunks and prairie dogs.

The events are legal in every state except California. Each of these species is a key part of healthy, functioning ecosystems. Killing contests devalue native wildlife and glorify wasteful killing, while disrupting natural processes.

“California set the trend for the nation with this historic vote,” said Judy Paulsen, New Mexico representative for Project Coyote. “We hope that New Mexico follows suit and bans this barbaric practice that has no place in the 21st century.”

“The fact that these events are legal and apparently being held more frequently demonstrates the urgent need to close the loopholes in our state wildlife laws in order to protect all of New Mexico’s wildlife species,” said Phil Carter, wildlife campaign manager at Animal Protection Voters.

“Currently there are no limits to the number of the targeted species that can be killed during certain times of the year. Some species, such as coyotes and prairie dogs, can be killed any time of the year.”

Wildlife-killing contests give ethical hunters a bad name and serve no legitimate management purpose.

“Using animals as target practice as if they were a video game violates one of the core tenets of the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation: wildlife should only be killed for a legitimate purpose,” said Mary Katherine Ray, wildlife chair for the Rio Grande Chapter Sierra Club. “Most New Mexicans would agree that killing for fun and cash prizes is not a legitimate purpose, and in fact is morally reprehensible.”

Wildlife-killing contests are out of synch with the attitudes of most New Mexicans, and undermine the economic contribution of non-consumptive users of wildlife who account for $328 million in annual expenditures.2

“Being ‘number one’ in wildlife-killing sprees is hardly what the Land of Enchantment wants to broadcast to the rest of America,” said Michael Robinson of the Center for Biological Diversity. “And frankly, it’s more than a little sickening and shameful for those of us who live here to know that the wildlife we cherish may be shot and killed for a score.”

Wildlife-killing contests ignore the ecological value of their target species and can actually exacerbate conflicts with livestock. Peer-reviewed studies on coyotes and wolves demonstrate this result.

The groups urging action include Southwest Environmental Center, Animal Protection Voters, Wildlife Conservation Advocacy Southwest, Sierra Club: Rio Grande Chapter, Center for Biological Diversity, Project Coyote, Rewilding Institute, WildEarth Guardians, Sandia Mountain BearWatch and Conservation Voters New Mexico.


10 thoughts on “Is it time to end barbaric wildlife killing contests?

  1. Absent a U.S. Federal ban on Wildlife Killing contests the chances of each of 49 more states besides CA enacting contest bans are nil.

  2. I see nothing wrong with it as long as it is legal and there is an over abundance of the animals hunted. The meat is donated or consumed by the hunter. On the other hand I am not in favor of the canned hunts, not to be confused with culled hunts. Get a life and quit complaining about things you don’t understand. If you want to hug a wild animal, go to a petting zoo.

  3. Where is my comment? I guess you screen and post only those comments in favor of your ideals. Following the lead of anything California does is just plain ignorant.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s