Wildlife: Denali wolf packs hammered by hunting

Wolves draw tourists to Denali National Park.

Death of breeding wolves affects pack size and persistence

Staff Report

FRISCO — Following a steep drop in the Denali National Park wolf population, biologists have documented how the death of breeding wolves affects pack size and persistence. The number of wolves in the 6million acre park in Alaska dropped from 143 in the fall of 2007 to just 55 wolves in the spring of 2013, raising concerns about impacts to tourism.

Many visitors come to Denali with the expectation of seeing wolves, but a recent state decision to allow wolf hunting in area previously deemed a buffer zone has had a big impact on wolf numbers. According to the latest research, the death of a breeding wolf sometimes results in a wolfpack disbanding.

In recognition of the economic value of wolf viewing in Denali, state officials in 2000 created a 122-square mile no-take buffer zone on the park’s eastern boundary. But in 2010, the Alaska Board of Game, comprised of hunters and trappers, eliminated the buffer.  The wolf population across the 6 million acre park and preserve declined from 143 in fall 2007 to just 55 in spring 2013 – a drop by more than half in just six years.

Even with the buffer, Denali wolves were under pressure from hunting and trapping. In some years, a significant percentage of the total Denali wolf population was killed in the area. And biologists point out that it’s not just about sheer numbers — the hunting and trapping in the buffer zone has disrupted family and pack dynamics in the area.

“This research has important implications to the current viewability of wolves in the park,” said Denali Superintendent Don Striker. “Given the park’s current low wolf densities and small average pack sizes, we are concerned about harvest of wolves from packs that reside primarily within the park. The death of a breeding wolf could harm the packs that provide the greatest opportunities for park visitors to see a wolf in the wild, either through a lack of reproduction or the loss of the entire pack.”

In 2012, biologists at Denali National Park and Preserve noted a drop in wolf sightings following the death of a breeding female from a pack that lived along the Denali Park Road. This was one of several instances where the death of an individual wolf, from legal trapping or hunting, sparked widespread media attention and public outcry in recent years.

“This isn’t the first time we have noticed that the loss of a breeding wolf can affect the fate of the pack. We thought it would be valuable to systematically look at what happens to the pack and population following the death of a breeder,” said author Bridget Borg, National Park Service biologist and University of Alaska Fairbanks graduate student. Borg’s research looked at changes in wolf pack fate, reproduction, and population growth following the death of breeders.

Gray wolves typically live in packs consisting of the parents and their offspring from one or more years. In this structure, a wolf pack resembles the concept of a traditional family. Turnover among young members of a pack is common, as they leave to search for mates and start packs of their own. Breeding members typically have a longer tenure in the pack and act as a sort of “social glue.”

Borg, along with other NPS researchers and collaborators from UAF and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, examined data collected on 70 packs during a long-term study of wolves in Denali National Park. They found that breeder loss preceded or coincided with most documented cases of wolf pack dissolution (when a pack disbanded or was no longer found). However, the death of a breeding individual did not always lead to the end of a pack. In approximately two out of three cases where a breeder died, the pack continued.

“It appears that the sex of the lost breeder and the pack size prior to loss were important factors explaining pack fate following the death of a breeder,” says Borg. The probability of a pack continuing was less if a female died or if the pack was small prior to the death.”

Borg’s data also suggests that the death of a breeder has a greater influence if the wolf died during the pre-breeding or breeding season. “We noticed that human-caused mortality rates were highest during the winter and spring, which correspond to the pre-breeding and breeding seasons for wolves,” said Laura Prugh, co-author and wildlife ecologist at the UAF Institute of Arctic Biologist. “Harvest may lower the odds of pack survival because of this timing, especially when pack sizes are small.”

Surprising, higher rates of breeder mortality and pack dissolution did not correspond to lower population growth, indicating that the wolf population was resilient to the loss of breeding individuals at a population level, the scientists reported.  The authors suggest that wolves may compensate for the death of breeders in a variety of ways, such as rapid replacement of breeders or increased reproductive success the following year.

Although breeder loss appeared to have little impact on the overall Denali wolf population, the loss of individuals may be important at a local level. The researchers found that rates of denning and successfully raising pups into the fall decreased for packs in which a breeder died or was killed. It is the wolf packs that successfully raise pups near the Denali Park Road that tend to be seen most often by park visitors, according to NPS biologists.


7 thoughts on “Wildlife: Denali wolf packs hammered by hunting

  1. This is a sad number.. 2/3 of the wolves are gone in Denali. .. To what end?
    This probably isn’t sustainable .. Who will protect these wolves?
    Denali should be on this tragedy … !
    Our stewardship of our wild in America is in tatters .. Shame on our leaders

  2. In the shadow of another major delisting attempt by the federal government that would strip federal protection from gray wolves, this new study accurately illustrates the dire need for new research into the effects of hunting and trapping on wolf populations. The report’s conclusions should be a clear sign that the gray wolf needs nationwide protection. Where wolf management has been handed over to state agencies, such as in Alaska, wolves are exposed to anti-predator biases and harsh and inhumane ‘population control measures’. Wolves in Alaska are exposed to helicopter and night hunting as well as all forms of barbaric and indiscriminate trapping. Born Free USA has long monitored the wolf the situation across the United States. Breeding pairs are critical to the survival and recovery of gray wolf populations, this study proves this. Indiscriminate killing of wolves means that strong, breeding males may be lost, and nursing females may be shot leaving helpless pups to starve to death. Only smart and compassionate conservation efforts move us forward towards coexisting with recovering wolf populations and achieving a future where wolves survive wild and free.

  3. Well over two thirds less Denali visitor sightings since elimination of no-kill buffer zones by NP statistics.

    Dr. Gordon Haber who closely studied Denali Park wolves for over 43 years, pointed out a number of well-supported observations; among them:
    1. That human killing of wolves so socially disrupted the family groups that learned skills and cooperation were lost. In other areas of the US this has resulted in more likely attacks on domestics than would be the case if humans did not persecute or exploit the gray wolf.
    2. That, like many animals, and specifically as a result of wolf methods of contraception (alpha pairs actively and successfully prevent the breeding activity of others), that wolf-killing results in far higher reproductive rates. While this happens to all stressed species studied, it occurs in wolves due to social breakdown caused by human killing.

    Additionally, he and others discovered illegal baiting extremely close to Park boundaries, showing that trappers used GPS to specifically target the protected wolves of US National Parks, illegally enticing them to their deaths, depriving US citizens from witnessing one of the continent’s most ecologically enriching and important animals living within a relatively intact ecosystem.

    These trappers, utterly contrary to their legal machinations supporting their illegal and unethical activity and lives, should be held civilly, personally, and criminally accountable for damages and loss, of scientific study, of visitor experience and displeasure at the state of Alaska and those who destroyed the endemic species for whatever personal reasons they may have had.
    You cannot rob a bank because you do not like it, or are broke. Worse, you cannot kill someone, his/her entire family, community, or species because you have a personal aversion or financial interest in doing so.
    Those who kill the wolves of Denali and Yukon Charley Preserve violate the law in no less serious manner.

    1. I couldn’t agree with you more! This is a travesty … who can serve as our and the wolves’ advocate in Alaska on this topic? Return that buffer zone … it was obviously working!

      I just returned from a trip to Denali, where I went specifically to see wolves, among all of the other marvelous arctic creatures. No such luck.

      I only learned about that unscrupulous trapper, who has been baiting and trapping wolves at the every edge of the Park, the night before I left on my trip. Still had a wonderful time, and I love Alaska, but slaughtering these wolves and depriving both visitors and the Denali ecosystem of their presence and essential biological work is criminal and immoral.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s