Commissioners grapple with vexing questions related to new breed of electric-assisted bikes; changes to regs would require buy-in from U.S. Forest Service
By Bob Berwyn
SUMMIT COUNTY — The county commissioners continued to juggle a potentially hot political potato this week, as they tried to decide how to deal with the issue of electric-assisted bicycles on the local recpath system.
According to a memo from the open space and trails department, local bike merchants and others have asked the county to amend existing recpath regulations to allow the use of E-bikes.
Spelling out the issues, the memo explains that the majority of the 55-mile path system is on U.S. Forest Service land, where special use permits specifically designate the paths for non-motorized use. With the exception of the county commons, the rest of the paths cross private lands on individually negotiated easements. Any move to approve the use of E-bikes would involve re-writing those agreements and permits.
As motorized vehicles, the E-bikes are specifically prohibited on the paths, but they are, in fact, already in use in Summit County. For now, the county commissioners are still grappling with the question of whether or not they should be allowed, and if not, how to effectively enforce the ban. Here’s an overview of E-bike laws. Visit Electricbikes.com for some information on the many types of vehicles on the market. (more…)
Filed under: Breckenridge, Colorado, recreation, Summit County Colorado | Tagged: bicycling, Breckenridge Colorado, Breckenridge news, Colorado bicycling laws, Colorado news, E-bike bans, electric-assisted bikes, Summit County Colorado, Summit County government, Summit County News, Summit County open space and trails, Summit County recpaths | Leave a Comment »


Breckenridge Destinations supports independent journalism. Click for great deals on vacation lodging in Breckenridge.














Arapahoe Basin supports independent journalism. Click to visit The Legend online.
Powder's falling at Monarch!! Have you reserved your spot yet?


Innovative energy underwrites coverage of energy stories.


Commentary: Wellness weasel words in Summit County
Kim Fenske on the summit of San Luis Peak.
Analyzing Summit County’s wellness program: Tightening standards may exclude those employees who could benefit the most from participation
By Kim Fenske
The purpose of this commentary is not to criticize well-intended fitness programs. Rather, it is to evaluate the criteria used in punitive wellness programs that base insurance benefits on qualifying numerical data extracted from employee screening.
Summit County government, like many health insurance benefit providers, has adopted a wellness program based on the criteria of body mass index, cholesterol LDL, and blood pressure. The program is managed by the corporate health provider MiCare.
Previously, each employee received a deductible account of $750 each year. However, under the MiCare provider, employees must earn the benefit, limited to $500 annually, by meeting certain standards.Each year, the standards tighten. By 2013, each employee must attain BMI 24.9; LDL 140; and BP 120/80 to qualify for a monetary benefit. (more…)
Filed under: Colorado, commentary, Summit County Colorado, Summit County news | Tagged: health, Summit County Colorado, Summit County government, Summit County wellness program | 3 Comments »