Opponents of controversial expansion considering legal action
*Read all Summit Voice Peak 6 stories
By Bob Berwyn
FRISCO — Barring legal action, Breckenridge Ski Area could start implementing the controversial Peak 6 expansion as soon as early December after regional Forest Service officials rejected an appeal filed by a coalition of conservation groups, skiers and local residents. Read the appeal here.
Scott Armentrout, Supervisor of the Gunnison, Uncompahgre and Grand Mesa National Forests, the appeal reviewing officer, wrote Nov. 14 that he found that the approval for the project did not violate any federal laws, regulations or policies and recommended upholding White River National Forest Supervisor Scott Fitzwilliams’ decision to approve the 550-acre expansion.
The formal decision was made by appeals deciding officer Brian Ferebee, a deputy regional forester for resources. Read the full appeal decision here, and a summary of the appeal decision here.
“I agree with the ARO’s analysis as presented in the enclosed letter. All appeal issues raised have been considered and the record is adequate to support the Forest Supervisor’s decision,” Ferebee wrote in his Nov. 19 decision letter. “I affirm the Forest Supervisor’s decision to approve the Breckenridge Ski Area Peak 6 Project. I deny requested relief to set aside the decision or complete additional analysis.” (more…)
Filed under: Breckenridge Peak 6 expansion, Breckenridge Ski Resort, Colorado, endangered species, Environment, public lands, ski industry, Ski Resorts, skiing and riding, Summit County Colorado, Summit County news, US Forest Service, Vail Resorts, White River National Forest | Tagged: Breckenridge, Breckenridge Ski Area, Colorado, endangered species act, Environment, Peak 6 expansion, skiing, United States Forest Service, US Forest Service, White River National Forest | Leave a Comment »


Breckenridge Destinations supports independent journalism. Click for great deals on vacation lodging in Breckenridge.












Arapahoe Basin supports independent journalism. Click to visit The Legend online.
Powder's falling at Monarch!! Have you reserved your spot yet?


Innovative energy underwrites coverage of energy stories.


Commentary: More questions than answers on Peak 6
De-constructing the jargon
Tenmile Range skyline near Breckenridge, Colorado.
By Bob Berwyn
SUMMIT COUNTY — It’s sometimes tough to wade through the bureaucratic language used by government officials, and the most recent update on the Peak 6 expansion plan at Breckenridge is no exception. It’s one thing to use precise language with descriptive terms and commonly accepted definitions — that helps ensure that everyone in the conversation is on the same page.
It’s another thing to use confusing phrases that might mislead readers and obscure the real issues. There was no author identified for the Peak 6 memo included in the town council packet, but it has the feel of being written by committee, and doesn’t do much to illuminate what’s at stake. It’s full of passive clauses and three-syllable words where one-syllable words would be just fine.
Here’s a little deconstruction, and some questions I would ask as a town council member. Some of the original language from the memo is in bolded, followed by my comments in italics. (more…)
Filed under: Breckenridge Peak 6 expansion, Breckenridge Ski Resort, Colorado, Ski Resorts | Tagged: Breckenridge Peak 6 expansion, Breckenridge ski area Peak 6, Breckenridge town council, commentary, op-ed, Peak 6 expansion, ski areas, ski industry, Summit County News, U.S. Forest Service | 12 Comments »