About these ads

Wildlife conservation groups say cultural hostility to grizzlies could threaten their recovery in northern Rockies

sdfg

Grizzlies may still be facing some challenges despite making a good recovery in the northern Rockies. Photo courtesy Dr. Christopher Servheen, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Feds taking comment on plan to hand over management to states

By Summit Voice

FRISCO — Conservation groups led by the Center for Biological Diversity say a federal plan for Yellowstone grizzly bears puts their fate in the hands of states that are “culturally hostile” to large carnivores. The recovery plan could put grizzlies back on the road toward extinction, the group warned in their comments to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Wildlife conservation advocates are also worried that the plan doesn’t do enough to safeguard connectivity between populations. They want the federal wildlife agency to maintain Endangered Species Act protections for the bears until these issues can be resolved.

“This plan would reverse nearly 30 years of hard-fought progress toward restoring Yellowstone’s magnificent grizzlies. It would put bears that have been recovering right back in intensive care,” said Louisa Willcox, a northern Rockies conservationist with the Center. “By condemning Yellowstone’s grizzlies to permanent isolation from other grizzly bears, this plan would rob the iconic bears of a secure and healthy future.”

The comment period for the recovery plan closed last week. More than 40,000 Center activists from around the country, as well as a number of preeminent scientists, submitted comments raising serious concerns that it falls short of what’s needed to recover Yellowstone’s grizzlies.

The plan locks grizzly bears out of crucial habitat they will need to compensate for the recent collapse of two out of four of Yellowstone’s key grizzly bear foods. Climate change and the introduction of nonnative species have devastated both whitebark pine and cutthroat trout, forcing bears to forage for food more closely to people, where, not surprisingly, they are coming into greater conflict and dying at unsustainably high rates.

Instead of redoubling efforts to reduce bear deaths, the Fish and Wildlife Service is exacerbating the problem by paving the way for the states to allow hunting of grizzly bears.

“By turning the keys to management over to Wyoming, Idaho and Montana, which are culturally hostile to large carnivores, Fish and Wildlife will recreate the very conditions that landed the grizzly bear on the endangered species list in 1975,” said Willcox.

Within 200 years after European settlement, grizzly bears were hunted to the brink of extinction. Without the protections afforded by the Endangered Species Act, grizzly bears would likely already be extinct even in the nation’s oldest park, Yellowstone.

Because of their large home ranges and sensitivity to development, grizzly bears are considered barometers of the health of the ecosystems where they live. Where grizzlies are healthy, so are the rich array of other wildlife species — from native fish to bighorn sheep.

The comments from conservation groups also challenge the USFWS’s assessment of grizzly bear populations. After analyzing federal data, independent wildlife biologists say the population is actually declining.

“It doesn’t matter if there are 400 or 800 grizzly bears in Yellowstone — if they’re on a downhill slide, as the federal data shows, then they are headed for extinction,” said Willcox. “Unplugging their life support now is tragically wrong, and a clear betrayal of the public trust.”

Earthjustice worked with the Center for Biological Diversity to craft the detailed comments, along with many independent scientists who analyzed the plan and pointed out its significant flaws.

About these ads

3 Responses

  1. Why print this crap? I mean is that just a cut and paste for a CBD press release? Same baloney as with wolves. My favorite lie is the extinction one.

    http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/41688/0
    it remains widespread across three continents, and is still one of the world’s most widely distributed terrestrial mammals. Globally the population remains large, and is not significantly declining. There are many small, isolated populations that are in jeopardy of extirpation, but others, under more protection, are expanding.

    Lying in journalism is never a pretty thing. Eventually you just get tagged as a liar.

    • Why don’t you use your real name when making a comment like this?

      Clearly, there is an irrational fear and hatred of large predators in some areas which ends up being manifested by state government policies. Left to their own devices, some state would just as soon not have to deal with wolves and grizzles.

      The ESA speaks to wildlife populations in the U.S. It’s the counterbalance to that ignorance-based fear and hatred. The CBD is the day-to-day voice expressing the will of the people of the U.S. and the intent of the ESA. Often, they tell it like it is, and it’s worth putting it out there.

      All that said, I wish I would have had the time to write a more thoughtful essay about grizzly management. But you’ve given me some food for thought and a frame of reference for writing about this. Thanks!

  2. […] Michael: Yes, one can be an excellent biologist with a deep understanding of biological science and still be a lousy wildlife conservationist or manager.  Indeed, to be effective, knowledge must go beyond the theoretical and into practical application.  Future wildlife conservationists and mangers will need to know how to address the major challenges outlined above.  Some of the solutions will necessitate their having a deep knowledge of ecology and organismal biology, but it will also involve the practical application of that knowledge to real-life problem-solving.   Much of this will mean an ability to apply the so-called “soft skills.”  Soft skills–those related to teamwork, cooperation, communication, and consensus building—are becoming increasingly important in the modern world.  Whereas wildlife professionals of the past tended to be independent loners who enjoyed spending time alone in nature, today’s wildlife professionals must like dealing with colleagues, the public and the media and be excellent communicators and collaborators (Peek, J.M. 1989. A look at wildlife education in the United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 17: 361-365). Indeed, human dimensions are becoming increasingly important aspects of wildlife and habitat conservation (http://joomla.wildlife.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=859). Human attitudes and perceptions of wildlife are often key factors when developing effective conservation strategies (e.g., grizzly bears: http://summitcountyvoice.com/2013/06/30/wildlife-conservation-groups-say-cultural-hostility-to-grizz&#8230 ;). […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,259 other followers

%d bloggers like this: