About these ads

Grand Canyon uranium mining ban withstands another test

Federal judge once again rejects mining industry challenge to withdrawal

sdfg

Speculative uranium plays have raised the prospect of mining in the vicinity of the Grand Canyon. Photo courtesy National Park Service.

By Summit Voice

SUMMIT COUNTY — A moratorium on uranium mining in the greater Grand Canyon region withstood another test this week, as U.S. District Judge David Campbell denied a uranium industry motion to reconsider his previous ruling to let the temporary ban stand.

Mining interests could still go to a federal appeals court, but for now, the withdrawal enacted last year by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar will stand.

“It’s another good day for the Grand Canyon, and for rivers, wildlife, and communities across the West,” said Ted Zukoski of Earthjustice, one the attorneys representing conservation groups and the Havasupai Tribe in the case.  “The court has now twice rejected the uranium industry’s attempt to cripple the Interior Department’s ability to temporarily protect lands from destructive mining.”

The far-reaching challenge by the mining industry would have eliminated the Department of Interior’s authority to protect large tracts of public lands from mining. Over the last five years, the secretary has used his authority to “withdraw” areas greater than 5,000 acres for up to 20 years to protect lands all across the West.

Examples include nearly a half-million acres within national wildlife refuges; habitat for desert tortoises and pronghorns as well as archeological treasures in Nevada; habitat protecting the largest wintering Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep herd in North America (on Wyoming’s Whiskey Mountain); recreational areas in Washington and Wyoming; forests in Oregon; and special features like the Bonneville Salt Flats in Utah.

The court’s decision today does not end the four industry lawsuits challenging the Grand Canyon mineral withdrawal decision. Industry can still raise arguments that Interior Secretary Salazar failed to properly consider environmental and economic impacts of the withdrawal. Those issues are likely to be briefed later this year.

Background

A boom in uranium speculation in 2007 and 2008 led to thousands of new claims being staked around the Grand Canyon, spurring concerns about potential environmental impacts. Reacting to the speculation, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar withdrew 1 million acres of public lands from new mining claims and development on old claims lacking “valid existing rights” to mine. In January 2012, after more than two years of environmental review, the Interior Secretary withdrew the lands for 20 years.

According to conservation groups, the move helps protect  habitat for deer, elk, numerous reptiles, and habitat for endemic species, endangered fish and the imperiled California condor. American Indian tribes live in or adjacent to the withdrawn lands; the withdrawal area includes sacred and traditional sites these tribes have used for centuries.

A uranium boom in the area threatens to bulldoze miles of road, degrade habitat, spread toxic uranium dust, and could eventually pollute watersheds and aquifers that feed Grand Canyon’s biologically-rich and culturally-important springs and that provide drinking water to 30 million people.

The withdrawal does not prohibit old mines with valid rights from re-opening, and the Havasupai tribe and conservation groups have had to sue the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, including a lawsuit filed last week, for allowing 1980s-era mines to resume operations without first undertaking tribal consultations or updating decades-old environmental reviews.

The National Mining Association, Nuclear Energy Institute, Northwest Mining Association and others last year filed four lawsuits challenging the withdrawal and the underlying federal authority to enact any withdrawals larger than 5,000 acres. The Havasupai tribe and conservation groups intervened to uphold both.

About these ads

One Response

  1. […] Grand Canyon uranium mining ban withstands another test (summitcountyvoice.com) […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,747 other followers

%d bloggers like this: