In the wake of Aurora murders, Hickenlooper claims we live in a safe country, but outside a war zone, your best chance of being shot is in any major American city
By Bob Berwyn
SUMMIT COUNTY — Waking to the news of the mass shooting in Aurora brought back haunting memories of 9/11, when the first few hours of the day also passed in a dizzying blur of glimpses at CNN, interspersed with caring for my lively four-year-old.
Friday morning, my thoughts again immediately turned to my son, who was not in the house as the news unfolded, but thankfully far away from Aurora, safely attending a camp at Copper Mountain.
We’ve been to a few midnight movie premieres here in Summit County in recent years, time that was always filled with pleasant anticipation, so I was able to imagine the vibe in the theater last night before the show started.
What I can’t even begin to imagine is the feeling of horror that must have prevailed in the moments when the shooting started, nor the indescribable grief that families of victims are feeling.
As I watched the first few hours of news coverage, I could see an all-too familiar pattern emerging, with initial details about the shooter, the victims, the police response, and finally, reaction and statements from elected officials.
What was missing was a sense of outrage that, in this day and age, an individual can amass that sort of arsenal and use it to do unspeakable harm in a public place. Some of that outrage surfaced here and there in a few sound bites and interviews, but the overall sense of the coverage was, here we go again, and when will it end?
It won’t end until someone — or all of us — takes a stand, and sadly, Gov. John Hickenloooper missed a golden opportunity to do just that. When I saw him preparing for his first public statement around mid-day, I was fervently hoping that he would seize the moment to take a stand against senseless slaughter and violence.
Instead, I heard platitudes and vague generalities, and most astonishing, an attempt to reassure people: “This is a safe city, a safe state, a safe country,” Hickenlooper said.
Really? How many of the people who were in the Aurora theater will feel safe the next time they attend a midnight movie premiere — if they ever do so again?
I would argue that outside an active war zone, your best chances of being shot by a random stranger is in any large American city, and I think most statistics on violent crimes support that assertion.
Hickenlooper would have served the people of this state far better by choosing that moment to take a strong stand on gun control, acknowledging that we have a serious problem with gun violence in Denver and around the country. He could have easily galvanized public opinion for meaningful gun control on the spot.
There will be people who will say that now is not the time to talk about gun control, that it’s a time to grieve. But the fact is, any delay represents a wasted opportunity to win support for reasonable changes to gun laws that actually would make people safer. And there’s probably no better way to honor and memorialize the victims of this and past shootings than by actually doing something to prevent it from happening again.
Today is the day to act to prevent the next senseless gun deaths. Call your congressman, sign an online petition, talk to your friends and neighbors — do something.
Filed under: Colorado, commentary, op-ed Tagged: | Aurora murders, Aurora theater shooting, Colorado movie shooting, gun control, gun violence



Breckenridge Destinations supports independent journalism. Click for great deals on vacation lodging in Breckenridge.






Arapahoe Basin supports independent journalism. Click to visit The Legend online.
Powder's falling at Monarch!! Have you reserved your spot yet?


Innovative energy underwrites coverage of energy stories.


As horrible as this senseless tragedy was, it doesn’t happen often enough to warrant any major reform to our gun laws.
A certain percentage of the human population will behave in this fashion – killing others. The more people on the planet, the more often this will happen. Until the human race is gone, this will go on. What you really should call for is an end to murderers – not an end to guns.
By the way, a person could have killed a larger number of people in any number of other ways that would have been much easier and didn’t involve guns.
Last thought – there were about 9 – 10 times as many people who died in car accidents yesterday, and thousands more than that since the last gun murder. Why not call for an end to transportation?
Actually, in Colorado at least, there are more gun deaths than deaths from car accidents. Plus a car has a good use, to get around, a gun is used to kill.
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-sugarmann/gun-deaths-exceed-motor-v_b_1536793.html)
The US has more gun deaths, 15 times more, than any of the other wealthy, populous nations.
(http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2012/jan/27/jim-moran/rep-jim-moran-says-us-gun-homicide-rate-20-times-h/)
Don’t be so negative, we can fix this.
And this: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/research/hicrc/firearms-research/guns-and-death/index.html
This tragedy will Happen again and again. Much tougher Gun controls are absolutely needed, but our politicians Fear the Gun lobbyists. That is the simple truth. Plus a collective short memory of our citizens.
No doubt Republicans will be saying this week to never do anything in haste in the aftermath of a catastrophe, especially make new laws. But what that means is: never do anything, especially in the case of environmental regulation or gun laws, no matter what catastrophe happens.
Brilliant idea! Let’s take all the guns away from Americans. Surely the criminals will comply with this new mandate . . . right? Since they clearly respect the laws which are already in place, putting more laws in place must be the answer.
Despite the media’s portal of this psycho as a mild-mannered brainiac, he was a criminal the minute he bought the first gun or bullet (act in furtherance) with the specific intent of shooting it at innocent people. That crime is called attempt, for those of you NOT versed in the law.
Furthermore, when he rigged his apartment to blow and left, he was guilty of several other crimes. He was aware that his actions would likely cause great bodily harm to others; not to mention arson and the like.
Look at the figures reported by the DOJ and inform yourselves people. Last year over half a million Americans prevented becoming victims of potentially deadly crimes by lawfully using their firearms to fight back or scare of the criminals.
Laws don’t stop crime, they are a mechanism by which we can get criminals out of society and THUS reduce crime. The law-abiding follow the law. Criminals do not. Putting more laws in place will NOT have an impact on the criminal conduct.
Great article, I agree with you totally. Now is the time for a national dialogue.