PFCs showing up at near-toxic levels in sea turtles

Careful study shows near-toxic levels of PFCs building up in five endangered sea turtle species. Photo courtesy NOAA.

Nasty, persistent pollutants are becoming more pervasive in the marine food chain

By Summit Voice

SUMMIT COUNTY — Persistent and toxic pollutants are building up the marine food web to the point that they are measurable in sea turtles near levels known to be harmful to other animals.

Researchers  at the Hollings Marine Laboratory and four partner organizations   for the first time measured concentrations of 13 perfluoroalkyl compounds (PFCs) in five endangered species of sea turtles.

PFCs are man-made compounds used for stain-resistant coatings and fire-fighting foams and plastics manufacturing. As persistent and widespread pollutants, they are detectable in human and wildlife samples worldwide.

The chemicals infiltrate food chains and are toxic to the liver, the thyroid, neurobehavioral function and the immune system of animals tested in labs, including rats, mice and fish.

“In our experiment, we wanted to accomplish two goals,” said National Institute of Standards research biologist and study lead Jennifer Keller. “We wanted to get the first accurate measurements of the plasma blood concentrations of PFCs in five sea turtle species across different trophic [food chain] levels, and then compare those concentrations to ones known to cause toxic effects in laboratory animals. That way, we could estimate the potential health risks from PFC exposure for all five turtles.”

The five sea turtle species studied were the green, hawksbill, leatherback, loggerhead and Kemp’s ridley. Their preferred diets range up the food chain from the green’s sea grasses and algae to the crabs favored by the Kemp’s ridley. The researchers expected that the PFC concentrations would be higher in species that fed farther up the food chain, since their prey’s tissues would probably concentrate the pollutants.

This was generally the case. Plant-eating green turtles had the lowest plasma concentrations for the majority of PFCs examined, especially PFOS. As expected, leatherbacks, loggerheads and Kemp’s ridleys had progressively higher PFOS concentrations.

Surprisingly, however, hawksbills — who browse low on the food chain, primarily on sponges — recorded the second-highest average concentration of PFOS and were the only species to have a detectable PFOA level. The researchers surmise that this may relate to the locations where the hawksbills forage, or it may suggest that sponges have unusually high concentrations of PFOS and PFOA.

In the second part of the study, Keller and her colleagues compared the plasma concentrations of PFOS that they found in the five sea turtle species with previously reported concentrations that were shown to have adverse health effects in laboratory animals.

The results showed that hawksbills, loggerheads and Kemp’s ridleys had PFOS concentrations approaching those linked to liver and neurobehavioral toxicity in other animals; levels in loggerheads and Kemp’s ridleys approached those linked to thyroid disruption in other animals; and all five species had levels that approached those linked to suppressed immunity in other animals.

“Better understanding the threat of PFCs, especially PFOS, to sea turtles can help wildlife managers and others develop strategies to deal with potential health problems,” Keller says. “Our study provides the first baseline data in this area but more research is needed—especially for hawksbills after seeing their unexpectedly high PFC exposure.”

Located in Charleston, S.C., the Hollings Marine Laboratory is a collaboration of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, the College of Charleston and the Medical University of South Carolina.

 

 

 

Researchers from the College of Charleston’s Grice Marine Laboratory, NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service and the Loggerhead Marinelife Center also contributed to the study.

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,720 other followers

%d bloggers like this: