Global warming — without carbon dioxide

New study suggests that Earths climate has evolved to become more sensitive to greenhouse gases

A slightly different alignment continents during the Miocene Era may have been a big factor in sustaining warmer global temperatures with relatively low levels of CO2.

By Summit Voice

SUMMIT COUNTY — The modern era’s link between atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and temperatures is nearly undisputed as both have climbed in tandem during recent decades.

But new studies of fossilized plankton suggests there was a time in the Earth’s history, about 12 million to 5 million years ago, when the climate warmed without a corresponding increase in atmospheric CO2, perhaps because of vastly different circulation patterns in the world’s oceans.

The scientists, led by Jonathan LaRiviere and Christina Ravelo of the University of California at Santa Cruz, reconstructed an open-ocean Pacific temperature record during the late Miocene epoch, finding that temperatures across a broad swath of the North Pacific were 9-14 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than today, while atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations remained low–near values prior to the Industrial Revolution.

It was a time of nearly ice-free conditions in the Northern Hemisphere and warmer-than-modern conditions across the continents.

The research relies on evidence of ancient climate preserved in microscopic plankton skeletons–called microfossils–that long-ago sank to the sea-floor and ultimately were buried beneath it in sediments. The microfossils contain clues to a time when the Earth’s climate system functioned much differently than it does today.

The study suggests that the modern climate responds more readily to changing carbon dioxide levels than it has during the past 12 million years, possibly through changes in ocean circulation.

“It’s a surprising finding, given our understanding that climate and carbon dioxide are strongly coupled to each other,” LaRiviere said.

“In the late Miocene, there must have been some other way for the world to be warm. One possibility is that large-scale patterns in ocean circulation, determined by the very different shape of the ocean basins at the time, allowed warm temperatures to persist despite low levels of carbon dioxide.”

The Pacific Ocean in the late Miocene was very warm, and the thermocline, a boundary that separates warmer surface waters from cooler underlying waters, was much deeper than now.

The researchers speculated that the super-heated oceans may have resulted in a distribution of atmospheric water vapor and clouds that kept the globe warm with relatively low levels of CO2.

“The results explain the seeming paradox of the warm — but low greenhouse gas — world of the Miocene,” said Major, program director in NSF’s Division of Ocean Sciences.

“This work represents an important advance in understanding how Earth’s past climate may be used to predict future climate trends,” says Jamie Allan, program director in the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Division of Ocean Sciences, which funded the research.

Several major differences in the world’s waterways could have contributed to the deep thermocline and the warm temperatures of the late Miocene.

For example, the Central American Seaway remained open, the Indonesian Seaway was much wider than it is now, and the Bering Strait was closed.

These differences in the boundaries of the world’s largest ocean, the Pacific, would have resulted in very different circulation patterns than those observed today.

By the onset of the Pliocene epoch, about five million years ago, the waterways and continents of the world had shifted into roughly the positions they occupy now.

That also coincides with a drop in average global temperatures, a shoaling of the thermocline, and the appearance of large ice sheets in the Northern Hemisphere–in short, the climate humans have known throughout recorded history.

“This study highlights the importance of ocean circulation in determining climate conditions,” says Ravelo. “It tells us that the Earth’s climate system has evolved, and that climate sensitivity is possibly at an all-time high.”

The study was published in the most recent issue of the journal Nature. Other co-authors of the paper are Allison Crimmins of UCSC and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Petra Dekens of UCSC and San Francisco State University; Heather Ford of UCSC; Mitch Lyle of Texas A&M University; and Michael Wara of UCSC and Stanford University.

About these ads

11 Responses

  1. surprising finding? duh. co2 follows temp. and water vapor is much more powerful holding temps

    • That doesn’t make sense

      • which part? the fact that no matter how you say it it’s man’s fault. they are trying to explain that the temp went up anyway. withouy man and without co2. the problem is that this article proves that the whole AGW concept is wrong.

        • Yawn… methinks thou dost protest too much.

          • that’s your reply? and that’s all you have? so we have proof that the climate was much warmer without humans and less co2 and you simply dismiss it? that’s weak.

          • No, it’s just your knee-jerk conclusion, reached without reading and fully understanding the report.

            Nobody has ever said the climate didn’t change before people and CO2. Obviously, it has, many times and very dramatically, including ice ages.

            This research doesn’t prove that the current increases of CO2 aren’t causing the current warming. It does help explain past climate changes and helps inform the current understanding of climate change.

          • co2 is not the cause of global warming. never was, never will be. man could not produce enough co2 to even cause a hiccup. a single volcano can belch enough gas and dust to induce a short term shift in the climate. the climate is too big and complex for us to “get”. so, which is it? does co2 cause global warming or doesn’t it? it seems that it’s all always about co2 causing warming. i see this report (read in full by me) to be about co2 not really being a climate leader but rather a follower being released by the oceans after the warming has occured. and, this particular time in climate history, doing precisely what it has done in the past is being caused by man? logical? hmmmm.

  2. If this is true, we are cooked….

  3. too much wacky tabacky

  4. Thank you for a great sunmmary article on the role of ocean circulation and climate.

    The story of earth’s drifting continents impact on ocean circulation patterns and hence on the climate was fasinating. I have long been a student of the science of global warming and have wondered about this connection as a possible explaination for past climates. I understand it is just a piece of the full story but it was helpful to my understanding.

    Your voice of reason about the science of climate change is greatly appreciated. It is wonderful to find a voice of reason on this topic.

    Ed Coleman

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,597 other followers

%d bloggers like this: