About these ads

Colorado: Air pollution from gas fields worse than thought

Methane leakage from the gas production fields of northeastern Colorado may be twice as high as previously estimated, according to new research from NOAA.

Tons of toxic benzene leaking into the atmosphere from drilling operations

By Summit Voice

SUMMIT COUNTY — Oil and gas drilling operations in Weld County are probably leaking twice as much methane into the atmosphere as previously estimated, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which also reported leaks of toxic benzene gas after starting a routine tower-based monitoring program a few years ago.

“We may have been significantly underestimating methane emissions by this industry in this region,” said Gabrielle Petron, an atmospheric scientist with NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory and the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences.

Some of the pollutants picked up are known to damage air quality. Another, methane, is 25 times more effective per molecule than carbon dioxide at trapping heat in the atmosphere. The scientists were concerned. None of NOAA’s other air composition monitoring towers – there are eight, in total, scattered around the continental United States – had recorded anything similar. A link to the research is online here.

“So we set out to figure out where these chemicals were coming from, by going from the tower measurements 1,000 feet high up, down to the ground in a mobile laboratory,” Petron, said.

The researchers customized air sampling devices and atmospheric chemistry instruments and headed out to northeastern Colorado, downwind of possible sources to collect chemical “fingerprints” that would help identify the possible sources.

After taking dozens of samples and thousands of readings along rural roads, near oil and gas equipment, landfills, and animal feeding operations, the research team has an answer: The unusual air pollutants seen at the Denver tower came primarily from oil and gas production in northeastern Colorado’s Weld County.

“We found gas operations in the region leaked about twice as much methane into the atmosphere as previously estimated,” Petron said. “And the oil and gas infrastructure was leaking other air pollutants, too, including benzene, which is regulated because of its toxicity.”

The results of NOAA’s research were published late February in the Journal of Geophysical Research this week.

In 2008, the year most of the data were collected, Weld County had nearly 14,000 operating oil and gas wells.

The research team’s chemical fingerprinting work showed that oil and gas equipment and activities – well pads equipment including condensate storage tanks, pipelines, compressors and more – leaked or vented an estimated 4 percent of all natural gas produced to the atmosphere. That loss is about double the previous best-guess estimate, based on engineering calculations and industry data, of about 2 percent loss.

The team also found that emissions of benzene, a known carcinogen, are underestimated. Benzene is tracked and regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Petron and her colleagues found evidence of at least two sources of benzene in the region: oil and gas operations and something else, most likely cars and trucks on roads. And the new study found benzene emissions from oil and gas operations in the region to be significantly higher than expected, between 385 and 2,055 metric tons in 2008, compared with earlier estimates ranging from about 60 to 145 per year.

Finally, the researchers’ findings suggest that oil and gas-related emissions of more reactive volatile organic compounds, which contribute to lung-damaging ozone pollution, are also underestimated. More reactive VOCs were not directly measured in the 2008 study, but are almost certainly co-emitted with methane and larger alkanes. According to the EPA, the northern Front Range has been out of compliance with federal health-based standards in the summer since 2007.

Chemist Greg Frost, Ph.D. also with NOAA and CIRES and a co-author of the new study, said the work demonstrates the value of studying emissions from several perspectives. Top-down studies (such as from the tall tower) can complement and verify bottom-up approaches (such as estimates based on average leak rates at pipe junctions). 

“What Gabrielle has done is to use the mobile laboratory and tower data to make top-down estimates of emissions, which can be used to evaluate the bottom-up estimates from industry and regulatory agencies,” Frost said. “This is going to inspire a lot more research.”


About these ads

4 Responses

  1. “Quelle surprise? Non-! Interesting follow up to the story that was in the Denver Post last month about the amount of “ozone” around those very gas fields. If one doesn’t get you, the other will.

  2. Oil companies find it easy to deny that they emit unacceptable levels of toxic contaminants as long as no one measures them. They certainly are not paying for this measurement to be done.

    The legislature should force energy companies to fund independent monitoring and cleanup of the environment, and this cost should be borne by the companies without recourse, i.e. without passing them on to the taxpayer and consumer.

    Cancers and contamination-related related diseases occur with the same frequency in families of energy executives as in the general population. You would think they were intelligent enough to realize that chemical pollution hurts their families just as much as it does everyone else.

    I would truly love to see an energy company executive answering a grandchild asking “Why do you let poison get in the air I breathe and the water I drink, Grandpa”?

    Since I am accusing them of acting only in their own self-interest, perhaps it is time for them to wake up and do exactly that. Perhaps they think they are immune to the effects of ozone, benzene, and methane in the environment?

    • Never happen Mark. I worked in the oil patch and retired from it, the bottom line is how much money it costs. They would rather pay the fine[s] instead of stop production to fix the problem. It’s a mind set holdover from the beginning of the business.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,491 other followers

%d bloggers like this: