About these ads

Colorado: Coal mining expansion rejected for now

The Sunset Roadless area in Colorado. PHOTO COURTESY WILDEARTH GUARDIANS.

Regional Forest Service officials vacate earlier approval of coal mine expansion in roadless area

By Summit Voice

SUMMIT COUNTY — Regional U.S. Forest Service officials this week rejected a coal mining expansion that would have had significant impacts on roadless wildlife habitat in the Grand Mesa Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest near the West Elk Wilderness.

The 1,700-acre mine expansion proposed by the Arch Coal company was approved last year by the forest supervisor despite concerns about impacts to the Sunset roadless area. Conservation groups appealed the decision and regional foresters found that the approval violated federal environmental laws by failing to explain why the plan weakened environmental protection.

“This is a win for Colorado’s forests and wildlife, streams and clean air,” said Jeremy Nichols, Climate and Energy Director for WildEarth Guardians, one of the groups that challenged the decision.  “The Forest Service should protect these roadless lands and habitat by putting this damaging mine expansion plan to bed permanently.”

The appeal was filed by Earthjustice on behalf of the Sierra Club, High Country Citizens’ Alliance, WildEarth Guardians, and Defenders of Wildlife.

Though the coal mining is underground, the operation requires methane venting wells be drilled above the mine. According to environmental groups, the West Elk mine spews millions of cubic feet of methane pollution every day.

Methane is a potent greenhouse gas with 21 times more heat trapping ability than carbon dioxide.  Methane venting makes the West Elk coal mine one of the single largest carbon polluters in Colorado

“It’s good news for Colorado’s forests that this destructive proposal was sent back to square one,” said Ted Zukoski, an attorney with Earthjustice. “The Forest Service should not have been trying to pave the way for an incursion into roadless lands when a court recently upheld its authority to protect those lands.”

“This coal mine expansion would have paved the way for industrial development in a beautiful natural area, cost taxpayers millions in potential royalties from methane that is wasted instead of captured, and caused significant air pollution,” said Matt Reed, Public Lands Director of High Country Citizens’ Alliance, based in Gunnison County.  “We’re pleased that Colorado’s forests, wildlife and clean air won this round.”

About these ads

4 Responses

  1. Yup that methane stuff is almost as bad as water vapor w.r.t. global warming. I’d much prefer to increase our dependence on middle east and Venezuelan oil instead of using clean coal from Colorado for Colorado energy. We certainly don’t need any new jobs, right?

    • Plenty of places to get “clean” (cough, cough) coal w/o going into a roadless area, and better, more sustainable long-term jobs can be found in the burgeoning renewable energy field.

  2. You mean the coal they ship out of Colorado? You mean the American coal getting shipped off to China, as soon as they can get a port built in Washington State. Or do you mean the coal that you put in your cra to keep you from buying Venezuelan oil?

  3. Why aren’t they capturing the methane? Double pollution, goodness, where do these people come from who run these businesses? Exactly how many new jobs? Oh, “clean coal”, what a canard that is!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,273 other followers

%d bloggers like this: