Breckenridge Destinations supports independent journalism. Click for great deals on vacation lodging in Breckenridge.
Most experts agree that, given existing resouces, it would all but impossible to stop an Arctic oil spill on the scale of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. U.S. COAST GUARD PHOTO.
Conservation group advocates for an international Arctic response plan
By Summit Voice
SUMMIT COUNTY — With oil drilling activities in the American Arctic on the horizon, concerns are mounting about the lack emergency response capabilities, as well as information about environmental conditions in the area.
A new report by the Center for American Progress highlights some of those concerns, pointing out that several federal agencies have called for more studies of baseline environmental conditions. Oil spill cleanup experts also say more resources are needed for the U.S. Coast Guard to fulfill its mission in the region.
The report also explains that even the well-developed infrastructure and abundance of trained personnel in the Gulf of Mexico couldn’t prevent the Deepwater Horizon tragedy — and the country’s Arctic response capabilities pale by comparison.
Drilling for oil in the Arctic should not be pursued without adequate safeguards in place. If the Deepwater Horizon disaster had any lessons to offer, it’s that the importance of preparedness cannot be overstated. That’s why the report strongly recommend specific actions be taken by the federal government, by Congress, and by Shell and other companies before beginning exploratory drilling in the Arctic.
Recommendations in the report include:
- Ensure adequate response capabilities are in place before drilling operations commence
- Require and oversee oil spill response drills in the Arctic that prove the assertions made in company drilling plans prior to plan approval
- Engage other Arctic nations in developing an international oil spill response agreement that includes an Arctic Ocean drilling management plan
- Appropriate adequate funds for the Coast Guard to carry out its mission in the Arctic, including increasing our icebreaking capability
- Significantly increase the liability cap (currently $75 million) for oil companies in violation of drilling safety rules
Filed under: BP Gulf oil spill, energy, Environment, oil drilling, Summit County news Tagged: | Arctic oil drilling, Deepwater horizon oil spill, energy, Environment, oil drilling
Arapahoe Basin supports independent journalism. Click to visit The Legend online.
Powder's falling at Monarch!! Have you reserved your spot yet?
Innovative energy underwrites coverage of energy stories.
What I don’t see in the recommendations above, is anything concerning “safety nor quality equipment testing”. To rely on Shell or any other company that wants to drill up there to be safety conscious and/or making sure that the equipment used is first rate, new, pretested, as well as having quality control at the top of the list, not somewhere down there in the basement. When these companies know that they can get away with being fined if anything goes wrong, doesn’t do any good after the fact. Corners will be cut, because that’s the way the industry operates. To think otherwise, is like believing the rhetoric: “yes we can”, and we all know where that has gotten us.