University teams try to envision national parks of the future
By Summit Voice
SUMMIT COUNTY— The National Park Service is embarking on a delicate mission as it prepares to celebrate its centennial in 2016. The challenge is to maintain the rich tradition that have helped the parks become global icons, while at the same time, updating them to reflect 21st century values.
One of the ways the agency is addressing that challenge is by holding the Parks for the People design competition, aimed at re-imagining the parks by using design as a catalyst to creatively rethink their connections to people and their role as revered natural, social, and cultural destinations.
Parks for the People invited student and faculty teams to help build a common foundation of design principles for these extraordinary sites as the U.S. National Park Service embarks upon a new century of park design.
The following questions served as the basis for the challenge;
- How can design enhance the park experience?
- How can parks become more accessible?
- What is “preservation” and how can it evolve?
- What new ventures or partnerships could help connect parks to people?
- What is “sustainability” and what is its future role?
- What part can technology play in parks?
The first round of competition was recently completed. Teams from nine colleges and universities advanced from a field of 41 entries to design studio exercises and face a second jury review next summer.
“The teams have presented their vision to the judges; now they must collaborate with the parks to find ways to promote sustainability, inspire stewardship, empower youth, and foster dynamic connections among parks, communities and natural systems,” said National Park Service Director Jonathan B. Jarvis.
“Judges were faced with a rich variety of approaches that encompass architecture, landscape architecture, urban design, planning, ecology, preservation, the fine arts, and exhibition and web design,” he said. “It will be interesting to see how the teams react when they apply vision to the landscape and the national park visitor experience.”
All schools pulled together interdisciplinary teams — some include more traditional architecture, landscape architecture, planning, history and ecology but some teams included exhibit design, cartography, poetry, story-telling and animation. Teams span undergraduate and graduate programs. They are diverse and bring a range of perspectives from the island of Manhattan to Manhattan, Kan.; from Washington state to Miami and from New Jersey to Texas.
“We’ve challenged the most ambitious design studios in America to show us the park of the 21st century,” said Olympia Kazi, executive director of the Van Alen Institute, which is the primary collaborator with the National Park Service for ‘Parks for the People.’ We’re urging these terrific teams to think boldly – through deeply-researched design – about how parks can respond to their communities at a time of cultural and ecological change. We look forward to visions that will help us sustain and celebrate these national treasures.”
“Parks for the People is a significant test for these teams,” said Ethan Carr, associate professor from the University of Massachusetts Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning and a member of an independent advisory committee that judged the entries. “The national park system is at a significant point in its history as it adapts to changing social, environmental, and technological contexts.
The range of studios moving forward in this competition will explore ideas about how to respond to these changes – from climate change to a more diverse society to new forms of interpretive media – while ensuring continued stewardship of the parks themselves.”
The “Parks for the People” competition grew out of the 2008 Designing the Parks conference sponsored by the National Park Service, Van Alen Institute, The Cultural Landscape Foundation, Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy, The Institute at the Golden Gate, National Parks Conservation Association, University of Virginia and the George Wright Society.
The conference marked the start of a public-private partnership to promote the importance of well-designed public parks in contemporary society. The conference sponsors formed a partnership and produced six principles that future park planning and design must demonstrate: a reverence for place, engagement of all people, expansion beyond traditional boundaries, sustainability, informed decision-making, and an integrated research, planning, design and review process.
Van Alen and the National Park Service assembled the national design advisory committee to shape the competition and judge the entries. Team entries explore the designing the parks principles and address specific park projects, but may also investigate design and planning solutions that consider the way a modern visitor of any age, ethnicity, and ability relates to any national park and its story.
More information on the stage one winners is online at the Designing the Parks website.
Filed under: Colorado, Environment, national parks, public lands, Summit County news, Travel Tagged: | National Park Service, national parks, park design, parks for the people, Travel
Click on our Trippons logo for great savings in Summit County and other Mountain Towns!
April brought near-record warmth to Colorado
Key Colorado reservoirs unlikely to fill this year
Study pins down I-70 ski traffic patterns
New life for the Upper Arkansas River
Climbing La Plata Peak
Volcanoes just a drop in the global CO2 bucket
Himalayan glaciers not melting as fast as thought
Gulf oysters tainted by metals from Deepwater oil spill



Powder's falling at Monarch!! Have you reserved your spot yet?



Innovative energy underwrites coverage of energy stories.


Design studios & schools, engage the youth, as that’s where Ideas are born, as well as who will use them for many years to come.
Conservation is the removal of human influence upon the natural landscape. Trails, nature centers, logging, hunting, etc. Ask a forester what he conserves and s/he will evade the question.
A healthy forest is one that is under the sole control of natural processes and forces. It has reached equilibrium.
Parks and forestry are for people. There is no win-win solution. The natural landscape always loses.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_landscape