Dead coral is ‘smoking gun’ for oil spill damage in Gulf

Direct impacts from oil and dispersants and oxygen depletion suspected in die-off

On this coral, some apparently living tissue can be seen at the top right and areas covered by brown material on the left. A bard skeleton is on the bottom right. The most normal looking starfish in the picture is on the left branch, but all are more tightly coiled and immobile than normal. Credit: Lophelia II 2010; NOAA OER and BOEMRE

By Summit Voice

SUMMIT COUNTY — Federally funded researchers in the Gulf of Mexico last week discovered patches of dead and dying coral they say is most likely linked with the oil that spewed from BP’s failed deep water well last summer.

“We discovered a community of coral that has been impacted fairly recently by something very toxic … The proximity of the site to the disaster, the depth of the site, the clear evidence of recent impact, and the uniqueness of the observations all suggest that the impact we have found is linked to the exposure of this community to either oil, dispersant, extremely depleted oxygen, or some combination of these or other water-borne effects resulting from the spill,” biology professor Charles Fisher said in a Nov. 5 press release issued by Penn State.

Fisher was the chief scientist aboard a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration research voyage in the Gulf that included federal scientists and researchers from several other universities. He called the finding a “smoking gun” that, for the first time, conclusively links the oil from BP’s ruptured Macondo Well with significant environmental damage.

“The compelling evidence that we collected constitutes a smoking gun,” Fisher said. “The circumstantial evidence is extremely strong and compelling because we have never seen anything like this — and we have seen a lot; the visual data for recent and ongoing death are crystal clear and consistent over at least 30 colonies; the site is close to the Deep Water Horizon; the research site is at the right depth and direction to have been impacted by a deep-water plume, based on NOAA models and empirical data; and the impact was detected only a few months after the spill was contained.”

Fisher said the research team encountered a colony of unhealthy hard coral (Genus Madrepora) that appeared to be on Nov. 2 2010 at a depth of 1400 meters. “

Although some branches of the coral colony appeared normal, other branches clearly were covered in a brown material, apparently sloughing tissue, and were producing abundant mucous,” Fisher said.

The scientists sampled pieces of this hard coral and of its immediate environment then, about 400 meters away, they found a seriously stricken community of soft corals.

“Within minutes of our arrival at this site, it was evident to the biologists on board that this site was unlike any others that we have seen over the course of hundreds of hours of studying the deep corals in the Gulf of Mexico over the last decade with remotely-operated-vehicles (ROVs) and submersibles,” Fisher said. “We found that extensive portions of most of the coral colonies were either recently dead or were dying. Most of the soft coral sea fans had extensive areas that were bare of tissue, covered with brown material, and/or had tissue falling off the skeleton. Many of the colonies appeared recently dead, with no living coral tissue, still covered with decaying material, and also with a notable lack of colonization by other marine life, as would be expected on coral skeletons that had been dead for long periods of time,” Fisher said.

The scientists also found that many of the brittle stars that are the typical symbiotic partners of these types of corals also appeared to be very unhealthy. “Many of the dead and dying coral colonies had discolored and immobile brittle stars — a kind of starfish — still attached,” Fisher said.

The team took a variety of samples that will be analyzed for the presence of hydrocarbons and for molecular evidence of genetic damage and physiological stress that could give direct evidence of exposure to oil or dispersants from the Deep Water Horizon disaster.

However, Fisher said it is possible that lab results might not be able to provide any new information. “For example, a plume of toxic dispersant or oil blowing through this community could have caused damage that resulted in the slow death of the corals without leaving any trace on the sea floor near the corals,” Fisher said. “No one yet knows if the signature of whatever toxin killed these corals can be found in their skeletons after the tissue sloughs off. No one even knows if dispersant accumulates in the tissues that it kills.”

About these ads

One Response

  1. [...] dive site will likely be the location where a preceding expedition that ended in early November found signs of dead and dying corals near the Macondo 252 well, which blew out on April 20 and continued to pour oil into the Gulf for 86 [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,571 other followers

%d bloggers like this: