Silverthorne: Conflict of interest questions boiling up

Town manager says council members — not staff — initiated talks about a potential conflict of interest on a pending development application for Lowe’s, while  a second council member said he was also approached in private about the issue

The Silverthorne Town Council Wednesday will discuss plans for a proposed Lowe's store. A vote on the issue will be preceded by a conflict of interest discussion.

SUMMIT COUNTY — A discussion about potential conflict of interest issues will precede Wednesday’s vote on a site plan approval for a proposed Lowe’s store in Silverthorne, as elected officials in the town grapple with the contentious issue.

Two council members, Dave Anderson and Dave Preuss, said they were approached by other council members, who raised questions about conflict of interest and suggested that they should recuse themselves from voting on the development application.

Anderson is a part-owner of Neils Lunceford, a landscaping business in town, and Preuss is a cabinet-maker whose business would also face competition from the discount big retailer.

During the weekend, Anderson said he’s willing to give up his vote, but charged that town manager Kevin Batchelder and town attorney Jerry Dahl were involved in starting the discussions about conflict of interest, but Tuesday, Batchelder denied those incendiary claims.

“I’m upset and concerned about those untrue allegations … They’re not true and not consistent with the facts,” Batchelder said, adding that Anderson’s charges could be damaging to his professional reputation.

Batchelder said council members initiated discussions with the town attorney about potential conflict of interest.

“Town staff was not involved in those discussions,” he said.

Batchelder said it’s appropriate for council members to discuss potential conflict of interest issues among themselves, as long as it’s not more than two individuals involved in the talks, and as long as they’re not talking about the process — but not land use decisions.

The distinction is that council members act in a quasi-judicial role when they make land-use decisions, and there are strict state and town codes to ensure a fair hearing for applicants.

“They sit as judges on these land-use cases,” Batchelder said.

According to the town charter, elected officials are not supposed participate in any discussion or deliberation on any question in which they have a “substantial personal or financial interest, direct or indirect, including an interest held through a spouse or family member.”

The charter also requires elected officials to disclose if they have such an interest and directs the remaining members of the council to vote whether it constitutes a conflict.

About these ads

2 Responses

  1. At least Silverthorne had the courage to take this on. Frisco caved in to a vote of the rather biased populace to make their decision for them about Home Depot!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 6,964 other followers

%d bloggers like this: